This post may contain affiliate links which means I may receive a commission for purchases made through links. Learn more on my Private Policy page.
ThereS a certain moment, about fifteen minutes into a hike, when we discover whether our boots are going too be our partners or our problems. With the Columbia Men’s Crestwood Mid Waterproof Hiking Boots, that moment came on a drizzly morning, halfway up a muddy trail, when we realized we weren’t thinking about our feet at all-adn that was the first good sign.
We’ve been taking these boots through weekend forest walks, rocky ridge scrambles, and a few surprise downpours that turned packed dirt into slick clay. On paper, the Crestwood Mids promise the usual Columbia formula: a lightweight build, waterproof protection, and enough cushioning to keep us moving comfortably from trailhead to car park. But we wanted to know how they actually feel once the laces are tied and the weather stops cooperating.
In this review, we’ll share our experience breaking them in, testing their waterproofing, seeing how they handle different types of terrain, and checking whether the comfort holds up over longer days. If you’ve been eyeing the Crestwood Mids as your next all‑round hiking boot-something that can handle both casual local trails and more demanding day hikes-our time on the trail should help you decide if they deserve a spot by your front door.
First Impressions and Overall Performance of the columbia Mens Crestwood Mid Waterproof Hiking Boots
From the moment we laced these up, we noticed how purpose-built they feel for changeable weather and shifting terrain. The upper gives off a rugged,trail-ready vibe while still looking clean enough for casual wear,and the mid-height design immediately inspires a bit more confidence around loose rocks and slick roots. Traction feels secure underfoot and the overall build suggests a boot designed to keep us cozy and protected throughout the season rather than just for a weekend trip. We also appreciate that they’ve been around sence 2019,long enough to gather plenty of real-world feedback without feeling outdated.
- Weather-ready construction that helps keep feet dry and supported
- Supportive mid-cut profile for added ankle stability on uneven ground
- Balanced cushioning that doesn’t feel too soft or too stiff
- Proven popularity with a strong review score and solid ranking in men’s hiking footwear
| Category | Impression |
|---|---|
| Comfort | All-day wear feels realistic |
| Durability | Sturdy build for frequent hikes |
| Versatility | Trail to town-friendly style |
| User Feedback | 4.5/5 stars from hundreds of reviews |
our early experience suggests a boot that balances comfort, protection, and everyday practicality, making it a reliable option for those of us who want one pair that can handle both muddy trailheads and wet city sidewalks.
Check the latest price and reviews on Amazon
Design Comfort and Fit How These Boots Feel on the Trail
The overall design leans toward practical trail performance rather than flashy style, and we appreciate how that translates to real comfort once we lace up. The mid-cut profile gives us reassuring ankle support without feeling bulky, and the padded collar and tongue help prevent hot spots when we’re moving over uneven ground. On longer outings, the interior cushioning feels balanced-soft enough to absorb shock, yet structured enough that our feet don’t sink or slide around inside. Even when the weather turns and the trail gets slick, the waterproof build keeps us dry, so we’re not distracted by damp socks or clammy toes.
On-foot, these boots feel broken-in quicker than many stiff backpacking options, and the fit runs true for most of us, leaving just enough room for thicker hiking socks. We’ve noticed they stay relatively light underfoot, which makes a difference on full-day hikes when every ounce starts to count. Small touches like the secure lacing system and supportive midsole make them feel dialed-in for mixed terrain.
- Padded ankle support for added stability on rocky sections
- Cushioned midsole that absorbs impact on long descents
- Roomy toe box that helps reduce rubbing and blisters
- Water-resistant comfort that keeps our feet feeling fresh
| Trail Feel | Stable yet flexible |
| Weight on Foot | Light-mid |
| Break-in Time | Short |
| Best For | Day hikes & weekend trips |
Check the latest trail-ready price on Amazon
Waterproofing Traction and Durability in Real World Conditions
Out on wet trails and muddy forest floors, we found the waterproofing holds up impressively for an all‑season hiker. Light to moderate rain, shallow stream crossings, and slushy snow were all handled without any seepage, keeping our socks dry and our feet warm. The materials feel built to protect throughout the season, and the mid-cut design adds just enough coverage around the ankle to keep splashes from sneaking in. While we wouldn’t treat them like waders in knee‑deep water, the overall weather protection inspires confidence when the forecast looks unpredictable.
Traction and durability also stand out in real‑world use. On loose gravel, damp roots, and compacted dirt, the outsole grips reliably without feeling overly stiff. After repeated weekend hikes,the upper shows minimal scuffing and the sole wear is surprisingly light,reassuring us that these boots are made to last rather than just look good out of the box. We particularly appreciate how they balance comfort and toughness, making them suitable for both casual day hikes and more demanding terrain.
- Waterproofing: Keeps feet dry in rain, puddles, and light snow
- Season-Ready Design: Built for comfort and protection across changing weather
- Trail Grip: Steady traction on mixed, uneven surfaces
- Long-Term Wear: Materials resist scuffs, abrasions, and sole breakdown
| Condition | Performance |
|---|---|
| Light Rain | Dry and Comfortable |
| Mud & Slush | Secure Grip |
| Rocky Trails | Stable and Supportive |
| All-Season Use | Consistent Protection |
Check current price and trail-readiness on Amazon
Who These Boots Are Best For and How We Recommend Using Them
These are a smart fit for hikers who want an all-season companion rather than a single-purpose, ultra-technical boot. With a mid-cut profile and waterproof build designed to keep us comfortable and protected throughout the season, they suit weekend trail explorers, casual day hikers, and anyone who likes having one reliable pair ready for wet sidewalks, muddy paths, or light snow. We see them working especially well for people who want something they can wear straight from city streets to forest trails without needing a second pair in the trunk.
We recommend using them for:
- Short to moderate hikes on mixed terrain where comfort matters as much as grip.
- Travel and weekend getaways when luggage space is tight and one versatile boot has to do it all.
- Daily wear in bad weather, from rainy commutes to slushy winter errands.
| Best For | Why we Like Them | Usage Tip |
|---|---|---|
| All-season hikers | Comfort and protection in changing weather | Pair with midweight socks for most conditions |
| Outdoor commuters | Trail-ready grip that still looks city-friendly | Keep them by the door for rainy-day grab-and-go |
| New hikers | Accessible option with solid user ratings | Break them in on short walks before longer trails |
Check current price and reviews on Amazon
Customer Reviews Analysis
Customer Reviews Analysis
After digging through dozens of buyer comments on the Columbia Men’s Crestwood Mid Waterproof Hiking Boots, we noticed some clear patterns. Most customers are pleased with the overall comfort, value, and versatility, with a few recurring caveats around sizing and the occasional quality-control hiccup.
overall Sentiment
Feedback skews strongly positive. Reviewers repeatedly describe the boots as “comfortable,” “lightweight,” and “great value,” and many mention buying multiple pairs over time. Even when criticisms appear, they tend to be mild and focused on fit or minor cosmetic issues rather than performance failures.
| Aspect | Customer mood | Common Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| Comfort | Vrey positive | All‑day wear, no break‑in |
| Weight | Positive | Surprisingly light |
| Waterproofing | Positive | Dry feet in snow & rain |
| Durability | Cautiously positive | Holds up well so far |
| Fit & Sizing | Mixed | Mostly true, some find them small/narrow |
Comfort & Fit
Comfort is the star of these reviews. Several buyers highlight that the Crestwood Mids feel good “straight out of the box,” with essentially no break‑in period. People wearing them for long days on their feet-whether working with wood, walking around property, or using them as everyday outdoor footwear-report that their feet stay happy.
- One reviewer calls them “the best” for a partner who is on his feet all day, from work to dinner.
- Another notes they feel “supportive without being stiff,” even during extended walking and mixed terrain use.
fit is generally described as true to size, but not universally. A few key patterns emerge:
- At least one customer felt they “run a little small” and suggests going a half size up.
- A wide‑foot buyer who ordered a 10W found them “on the narrow side” but still wearable.
- Standard sizes like 9.5 were reported as a “perfect fit” with good room in the toe box and a secure heel.
Our takeaway: for average-width feet, regular sizing seems to work. If your feet are wide or you plan to wear thick hiking socks, a half size up-or a careful check of the wide option-might be safer.
| Fit Feedback | What We Infer |
|---|---|
| “Perfect fitment” / “true to size” | Standard feet likely fine with regular size |
| “Run a little small” | Consider half-size up if between sizes |
| “10 wide… on the narrow side” | Wide feet may still find them snug |
Weight, Traction & Everyday Use
We see a recurring surprise at how light these boots feel for a mid-height waterproof model. Words like “super light weight” and “light yet sturdy” come up more than once. For customers using them as daily drivers-outdoor chores,errands,and casual walks-this lighter build is a big plus.
Traction feedback is similarly reassuring:
- One reviewer notes that the tread doesn’t pick up “a lot of mud & debris” and still offers reliable grip.
- Another mentions “solid traction on mixed surfaces,” from city sidewalks to uneven outdoor ground.
- Even with a loaded backpack and several gallons of water, the boots felt stable during a short urban trek.
Several people use them not just for hiking, but also for everyday wear, errands, property work, and upcoming travel (including a Hokkaido trip), which hints at their versatility and casual-friendly styling.
Waterproofing & Weather Performance
Where buyers have tested the waterproofing, reports are consistently strong. One story stands out: snow halfway up the leg, 15 minutes of shoveling, and “not once did my feet even get cold”-no leakage despite the relatively slim profile. Another reviewer calls out that the boots are both waterproof and warm, and even boosts protection with extra water-repellent spray.
Elsewhere, users note dry feet in damp ground and light rain, with enough breathability to avoid the swampy feeling some waterproof boots create. Not every reviewer has tested them in heavy downpours, but early signs in wet, cold conditions are encouraging.
| Condition | Reported Performance |
|---|---|
| Snow & shoveling | Feet stayed warm and dry |
| damp ground / light rain | Waterproofing holds, still breathable |
| No wet-weather test yet | Comfort praised, durability “to be seen” |
Durability & Construction
Several customers have a history with Columbia mid hikers and call out that these Crestwoods seem at least as tough as more expensive competitors. One long‑time Columbia wearer specifically mentions better durability than some pricier brands used in the past.
There is, though, a note of caution: multiple reviewers use phrases like “only time will tell” and “so far so good.” Simply put, early impressions are solid-boots feel “well constructed” with ”very thick and durable” soles-but we do not yet have a consensus from long-term abuse on rocky trails.
The one clear negative around build quality is a minor cosmetic issue. A buyer received a pair with a small defect in the rubber molding and had to wait extra days for a replacement. The second pair was fine, but the slower replacement shipping left a bad taste, even though it did not reflect the boot’s performance once the right pair arrived.
Style, Value & Use Cases
On the style front, the boots are described as “nice looking” and “still look good to go out for dinner.” That’s not something we see in every hiking-boot review. It suggests a low-profile, wearable design that can move from trail (or job site) to casual outings without screaming “backpacking trip.”
Value is another recurring theme:
- Multiple references to “great value” and happiness with the price paid.
- At least one buyer has purchased three pairs, taking advantage of a sale.
- Another highlights fast shipping and “perfect fitment” as part of their positive experience.
| What People Use Them For | How They Performed |
|---|---|
| Daily outdoor work | Comfy all day, good support |
| Hiking & property chores | Light, stable, solid grip |
| Travel & city walking | No break‑in, stylish enough for casual wear |
| Cold & wet conditions | Warm, dry, not overly bulky |
Where Customer Feedback Leaves Us
Putting all these voices together, we see the Columbia Crestwood Mid Waterproof Hiking Boots as a lightweight, comfortable, and budget-friendly option that works across a wide range of everyday and outdoor scenarios. Comfort, waterproofing, and versatility are clear strong points, while potential pressure points are:
- Sizing quirks for wide feet or those between sizes.
- Isolated cosmetic issues and slower-than-hoped replacement shipping.
- Limited long-term trail abuse data in the reviews we’ve seen so far.
For hikers and outdoor users who prioritize comfort, low weight, and value-and who don’t mind double-checking sizing-customer experiences suggest these boots are more than pulling their weight.
Pros & Cons
Pros & Cons
After putting the Columbia men’s Crestwood Mid Waterproof Hiking Boots through mixed terrain and mixed weather, here’s how they shook out for us.
Pros
- Reliable waterproofing - The membrane kept our feet dry through wet grass, muddy trails, and light rain without feeling swampy inside.
- Surprisingly lightweight – For a mid-cut boot, they feel closer to a sturdy trail shoe than a clunky backpacking boot, which helped us move faster and longer.
- Comfortable out of the box – Minimal break‑in; we had no serious hot spots on first full‑day hikes, just a bit of expected snugness around the midfoot.
- Secure mid-ankle support – The mid height gave us enough confidence on rocky switchbacks without over-restricting ankle movement.
- Solid traction on most surfaces - The outsole gripped dry dirt, packed trails, and forest floor debris well, with predictable braking on descents.
- Versatile, low-key styling – We felt fine wearing them straight from the trail to casual errands; they don’t scream ”technical mountain boot.”
- Proven track record – With thousands of sales and a 4.5-star average rating, we’re not the only ones finding them dependable for day hikes.
- Good value for weekend hikers – For the price bracket, the mix of waterproofing, comfort, and durability feels well balanced for casual to moderate use.
Cons
- Not ideal for heavy loads – When we loaded up for overnight trips, the support felt borderline; they’re better suited to day packs than big backpacks.
- Breathability has limits - In hot, humid conditions our feet warmed up quickly; the waterproof lining is a trade‑off if we mainly hike in summer heat.
- Traction on slick rock is just okay – On wet rock and smooth roots, the outsole didn’t inspire as much confidence as more aggressive, premium soles.
- Cushioning is on the firmer side – After long days on hardpack, we wished for a bit more underfoot softness or a more cushioned aftermarket insole.
- Toe box may feel snug for wide feet – Some of us with broader forefeet noticed a tighter fit up front; wide sizes help, but not in every colorway.
- Materials feel more “practical” than premium - The upper is tough enough, but the mix of synthetics and suede doesn’t have that high‑end, rugged-lux feel.
At a Glance
| Aspect | Our take |
|---|---|
| Best For | Day hikes & weekend trails |
| Support Level | Moderate, not for heavy packs |
| Weather | Wet, cool to mild conditions |
| Trail Type | Groomed & moderately rocky |
| Value | Strong for casual hikers |
Q&A
Q&A: Columbia Men’s Crestwood Mid Waterproof Hiking Boots
Q: Are the Crestwood Mid boots truly waterproof?
We found the waterproofing solid for rain, wet grass, and shallow puddles.The membrane and treated leather kept our feet dry on soggy trails. In sustained downpours or water above ankle height,they’ll eventually wet out,but for typical day hikes and three-season use,the waterproofing held up well.
Q: how do they fit compared to other hiking boots?
In our experience, they run true to size with a medium width.There’s enough room in the toe box for light to midweight hiking socks without feeling sloppy. Wide-footed hikers might find them a bit snug and may want to size up a half-step or look for a wide option if available.
Q: Are these boots comfortable right out of the box?
We had minimal break-in. The uppers felt flexible on the first hike, and we didn’t experience hot spots on shorter outings.For longer treks, the cushioning is on the firmer side, so inserting aftermarket insoles could help if you prefer a more plush underfoot feel.
Q: How is the traction on rocky or muddy trails?
the outsole grips well on packed dirt, gravel, and dry rock. On wet roots and slick rock, we had to be a bit more purposeful with foot placement, but the lugs still inspired confidence. In deep mud, they perform decently, though the relatively shallow lug pattern doesn’t shed heavy clay as efficiently as more aggressive backpacking boots.
Q: Are these boots suitable for winter hiking?
We see them as three-season boots.They’re waterproof and reasonably warm with thick socks in cool weather, but they’re not insulated winter boots. On icy surfaces, we’d still pair them with microspikes. For deep snow and subfreezing conditions, dedicated winter footwear would be a better call.
Q: How durable do they feel?
The combination of suede leather and synthetic overlays felt sturdy during our testing. Stitching was clean and held up after repeated use. We’d rate them as durable enough for regular weekend hikes and light backpacking. Ultra-rugged expedition boots they are not, but for their category, they seem built to last.
Q: Are they lightweight or more on the heavy side?
We’d classify them as light-to-midweight.They’re noticeably lighter than full-grain leather backpacking boots, which made them less fatiguing over a full day. Though, they still offer more support and structure than a low-cut trail shoe.
Q: How much ankle support do they actually provide?
The mid-cut collar gives moderate ankle support. We appreciated the extra stability on uneven ground and when carrying a light pack. If you need rigid, high-cut support for very rough or off-trail terrain, these might feel a bit flexible, but for standard trails they struck a good balance between freedom of movement and security.
Q: Do they breathe well, or do feet get sweaty?
For a waterproof boot, breathability was respectable. On cool and mild days, our feet stayed comfortable. In hot weather, they did start to feel warm-typical of most waterproof designs-so for summer desert hikes we might switch to a more ventilated shoe.
Q: Would we recommend them for backpacking, or just day hikes?
We’d happily take them on day hikes and light overnight trips with moderate pack weights. For extended multi-day treks with heavy loads, some hikers might prefer something with a stiffer sole and beefier construction, but for most recreational use, the Crestwood Mid handles the job.
Q: How do they compare value-wise to similar boots?
Given the customer rating (4.5 out of 5 from hundreds of reviews) and their position among top men’s hiking boots, we see them as strong value. You get waterproofing, solid comfort, and reputable brand backing without paying premium-flagship prices.
Q: What about warranty and after-sales support?
The manufacturer notes that a warranty can be requested through Columbia’s customer service. We like knowing there’s an official channel if defects pop up, though, as always, the exact coverage details are worth confirming directly with Columbia when you buy.
Q: Who are these boots best suited for?
In our view, they’re ideal for hikers who:
- Want a reliable, waterproof mid-cut boot for three-season trails
- Prefer a balance of support and comfort without excessive weight
- Hike mostly on established paths with occasional rough sections
- Are looking for solid performance at a mid-range price point
If that sounds like your hiking style, the Crestwood Mid is likely to feel at home on your feet.
Transform your World
As we lace up one last time, the Columbia Men’s Crestwood Mid waterproof Hiking Boots leave us with a clear impression: they’re not trying to reinvent the trail shoe, just to quietly master the fundamentals. Solid waterproofing, dependable traction, and day-long comfort make them a practical companion for hikers who value reliability over hype. They’re not the flashiest boots on the mountain, but they show up, hold up, and keep our feet surprisingly happy along the way.
If your priority is a straightforward, no-drama hiker that can handle unpredictable weather and mixed terrain, these boots earn their place on the shortlist.They fit neatly into that space between casual trail walkers and more technical backpacking boots, and for many of us, that’s exactly where our real-world adventures live.
Ready to see if the Crestwood Mids deserve a spot by your front door?
Check the latest price, sizes, and colors for the Columbia Men’s Crestwood Mid Waterproof Hiking Boots here.
